Receiving a compulsory acquisition notice can feel overwhelming. You're facing the loss of your property, and you need to know that you'll be treated fairly through the process.
These case studies show how we've helped Queensland property owners just like you achieve fair outcomes when their properties were resumed. Each story is real, though names and details have been changed to protect client confidentiality. What matters is the result: every client received more than the government's initial offer, and moved forward with confidence.
Marianne, a Brisbane school teacher building her financial future, bought her first investment property in Bald Hills. When the Department of Transport and Main Roads notified her that the property would be resumed for railway expansion, she was shocked and stressed. As a first-time investor with no experience in property resumptions in Queensland, she initially believed the government process would be fair and considered accepting their offer without independent advice.
Fortunately, Marianne's father urged her to seek professional help. When she engaged us to assess her property, we discovered features that set it apart from the comparable sales the Department had used. Through thorough research, we found a recent sale that justified a significantly higher value.
When our valuer met with the government valuer and presented this evidence, the Department immediately increased their offer by 12%. Marianne received not only the higher purchase price, but also increased disturbance payments based on that value, plus full reimbursement of her legal and valuation costs.
With her improved settlement, Marianne purchased a similar investment property and continued building toward her financial goals. The lesson: every property is unique, and independent research can make a substantial difference to your outcome.
Facing a resumption notice?
Contact us to ensure you receive the fair compensation you deserve.
Leslie and her partner Michael loved their Carseldine home. They'd lived there for years and considered it their forever home. When the Department of Transport advised that their property would be demolished to build a flyover across the train line, they were devastated. The uncertainty caused health problems for both of them.
The Dept's valuation caused additional stress. Their valuer assessed the property like every other house in the area, failing to recognise its unique features - including the large shed Michael had built to house his car collection, which was only possible because of the property's generous size.
We engaged early in the process, and our valuer understood what made Leslie's property special. His research identified comparable sales that properly reflected these features, resulting in a valuation 16% higher than the Department's offer.
We also secured increased disturbance payments and full coverage of Leslie's legal and valuation costs. Though heartbroken to leave her beloved home, Leslie used the improved settlement to make a sea change, purchasing a property north of Brisbane for significantly less than her payout.
Worried you won't receive fair value?
Let us help you achieve the outcome you deserve.
Brothers Bob and Egan had inherited their shed business from their father and built it into a thriving operation. They'd wisely invested profits into commercial property near the M1 Motorway - a large site where they operated their own business and leased additional sheds to other tenants. It was their nest egg for the future.
When the M1 expansion was announced, they knew immediately their property would be in the path. While the Department's offer for the property value seemed reasonable, it failed to account for their lost future income from the rental tenancies.
Once Bob and Egan engaged us, we identified that accepting the Department's offer would result in a significant shortchange. We negotiated not just the property value, but also compensation for loss of future business income, relocation costs, loss of trade, and the impact on their tenants.
The final settlement included a 20% increase over the original offer. Additionally, we negotiated for the brothers to lease back the entire property for several years until the Department needed it, allowing them to continue earning income while planning their next move.
Three years later, they purchased a larger property with their compensation, built more sheds, and relocated many of their original tenants at no cost to them. The value of their new investment has grown substantially since.
Don't accept the first offer.
Contact us to ensure you receive full compensation for your property and business.
Long-time property investors Billy and Marge had built a solid portfolio to fund their retirement. Their latest acquisition in Rocklea was rented out and performing well. When the Department of Transport notified them that the property would be resumed for a new railway station and intersection, they were understandably upset. Despite their investment experience, they'd never dealt with a resumption before.
Realising they needed expert help, they contacted us and during the joint property inspection with the Department's valuer and building inspector, everyone received an unpleasant surprise: the inspector discovered a large hole in the wall caused by termites - previously hidden behind the tenant's couch.
Termite damage requires costly repairs, and the Department wanted to deduct the full repair value from any settlement. This made negotiations complex and challenging.
After extensive negotiations and a meeting with all parties, both parties reached an agreement that was 8% higher than the Department's original offer. Remarkably, this 8% increase exceeded the decrease in value from the termite damage, meaning Billy and Marge received more than they would have if the property had been in perfect condition.
With their settlement, they purchased another investment property with a better rental return and continued building their portfolio for retirement.